- «Билайн» купил платформу для отправки СМС из приложений
- Rockstar Games перенесла выход новой GTA
- Microsoft повысила цены на консоли Xbox и игры
- Власти российских регионов почти полностью ушли из YouTube
- В приложении Яндекс Маркета появился AI-ассистент на базе нейросети YandexGPT 5 Pro
- Более 20 российских вузов будут готовить топ-специалистов в сфере ИИ к 2030 году
- Каждый третий студент переписывает за ИИ больше половины текста
Драйвер для устройств, использующих гра?
читать дальше >>
Программа для создания инсталляционных ?
читать дальше >>
Мультимедийный центр с открытым исходны?
читать дальше >>
Faizul "Piju" 9M2PJU: Docker vs Virtual Machines: What Every Ham Should Know
Before container technologies like Docker came into play, applications were typically run directly on the host operating system—either on bare metal hardware or inside virtual machines (VMs). While this method works, it often leads to frustrating issues, especially when trying to reproduce setups across different environments.
This becomes even more relevant in the amateur radio world, where we often experiment with digital tools, servers, logging software, APRS gateways, SDR applications, and more. Having a consistent and lightweight deployment method is key when tinkering with limited hardware like Raspberry Pi, small form factor PCs, or cloud VPS systems.
The Problem with Traditional Software DeploymentLet’s say you’ve set up an APRS iGate, or maybe you’re experimenting with WSJT-X for FT8, and everything runs flawlessly on your laptop. But the moment you try deploying the same setup on a Raspberry Pi or a remote server—suddenly things break.
Why?
Common culprits include:
- Different versions of the operating system
- Mismatched library versions
- Varying configurations
- Conflicting dependencies
These issues can be particularly painful in amateur radio projects, where specific software dependencies are critical, and stability matters for long-term operation.
You could solve this by running each setup inside a virtual machine, but VMs are often overkill—especially for ham radio gear with limited resources.
Enter Docker: The Ham’s Best Friend for Lightweight DeploymentDocker is an open-source platform that allows you to package applications along with everything they need—libraries, configurations, runtimes—into one neat, portable unit called a container.
Think of it like packaging up your entire ham radio setup (SDR software, packet tools, logging apps, etc.) into a container, then being able to deploy that same exact setup on:
- A Raspberry Pi
- A cloud server
- A homelab NUC
- Another ham’s machine
- Lightweight – great for Raspberry Pi or low-power servers
- Fast startup – ideal for services that need to restart quickly
- Reproducible environments – makes sharing setups with fellow hams easier
- Isolation – keeps different radio tools from interfering with each other
Many amateur radio tools like Direwolf, Xastir, Pat (Winlink), and even JS8Call can be containerized, making experimentation safer and more efficient.
Virtual Machines: Still Relevant in the ShackVirtual Machines (VMs) have been around much longer and still play a crucial role. Each VM acts like a complete computer, with its own OS and kernel, running on a hypervisor like:
- VirtualBox
- VMware
- KVM
- Hyper-V
With VMs, you can spin up an entire Windows or Linux machine, perfect for:
- Running legacy ham radio software (e.g., old Windows-only apps)
- Simulating different operating systems for testing
- Isolating potentially unstable setups from your main system
However, VMs require more horsepower. They’re heavy, boot slowly, and take up more disk space—often not ideal for small ham radio PCs or low-powered nodes deployed in the field.
Quick Comparison: Docker vs Virtual Machines for Hams Feature Docker Virtual Machine OS Shares host kernel Full OS per VM Boot Time Seconds Minutes Resource Use Low High Size Lightweight Heavy (GBs) Ideal For Modern ham tools, APRS bots, SDR apps Legacy systems, OS testing Portability High Moderate Ham Radio Use Cases for DockerHere’s how Docker fits into amateur radio workflows:
- Run an APRS iGate with Direwolf and YAAC in isolated containers.
- Deploy SDR receivers like rtl_433, OpenWebRX, or CubicSDR as containerized services.
- Set up a Winlink gateway using Pat + ax25 tools, all in one container.
- Automate and scale your APRS bot, or APRS gateway using Docker + cron + scripts.
Docker makes it easier to test and share these setups with other hams—just export your Docker Compose file or image.
When to Use Docker, When to Use a VM Use Docker if:- You’re building or experimenting with modern ham radio apps
- You want to deploy quickly and repeatably
- You’re using Raspberry Pi, VPS, or low-power hardware
- You’re setting up CI/CD pipelines for your scripts or bots
- You need to run legacy apps (e.g., old Windows logging software)
- You want to simulate full system environments
- You’re working on something that could crash your main system
Both Docker and VMs are powerful tools that have a place in the modern ham shack. Docker offers speed, portability, and resource-efficiency—making it ideal for deploying SDR setups, APRS bots, or automation scripts. VMs, on the other hand, still shine when you need full system emulation or deeper isolation.
At the end of the day, being a ham means being an experimenter. And tools like Docker just give us more ways to explore, automate, and share our radio projects with the world.
The post Docker vs Virtual Machines: What Every Ham Should Know appeared first on Hamradio.my - Amateur Radio, Tech Insights and Product Reviews by 9M2PJU.
ROAST my design before I end up in the streets
Hey everyone,
I recently launched a small SaaS project and while I’m getting some traffic, the conversion rate is sooo low. I’m trying to figure out if the design is part of the problem — or the problem.
So I’m here humbly asking you to roast it, and have no mercy. I want the truth — whether it looks bad, feels off, has bad UX, whatever. I can take it. I’d much rather be hurt now than burn through my life savings, sustaining an ugly saas.
Here’s the link: Tablextract
Let me know what’s confusing, ugly, inconsistent, slow, or just straight-up annoying. Also down for suggestions if you feel like being generous.
Thanks in advance!
submitted by /u/t4fita[visit reddit] [comments]
Представлены принципы дизайна компилятора Nimony для будущего Nim 3.0
Linux-дистрибутив, предназначенный для ?
читать дальше >>
Удобный компактный просмотрщик графичес?
читать дальше >>
British Woman Who Has Seen Six Monarchs Is World’s Oldest Person Alive At 115
Приложение Google Планета Земля для раб?
читать дальше >>
PrivaZer — бесплатная программа для уда?
читать дальше >>
PrivaZer производит сканирование ПК и б?
читать дальше >>
ChatGPT — официальное приложение чат-бо?
читать дальше >>
Chromium Portable — браузер с открытым ?
читать дальше >>
Chromium — браузер с открытым исходным ?
читать дальше >>
Swarovski x Crocs Take A Shine To Everyday Footwear… With $1,200 Blinged Clogs
White House Shares Faux Photo Of Donald Trump As The New Pope
Am I the only one that dislikes Wireframe CC?
I'm new to web design, so take this with a grain of salt. I've been browsing around for good, easy wireframe websites so I can finally stop using PowerPoint to do them. I tried the 7 day free trial for Wireframe CC and found it infuriating. Perhaps there's worse out there and I'm complaining about a decent wireframe software and I don't even know how good I have it. But my experience with wireframe was really clunky. Often when I added text boxes, it would then forget they were there and I could no longer select, edit or delete them. This happened to me on my college computer and my personal laptop, so I can't be the only one experiencing this. Has anyone else had this experience? I'm glad for the free trial because now I know I will never be subscribing for this product. Do yous have other recs, potentially for a free software I can use?
submitted by /u/cowbutch3[visit reddit] [comments]
Мобильное приложение ВТБ Онлайн — это п?
читать дальше >>
IRS покинули два архитектора криптоналогообложения из-за DOGE
Ведущие специалисты по цифровым активам в Налоговой службе США (IRS) Сет Уилкс и Радж Мукерджи покинут ведомство после предложения об «отложенной отставке» от DOGE. Об этом сообщает CoinDesk.
По информации осведомленных источников, формально Уилкс и Мукерджи останутся сотрудниками IRS еще несколько месяцев. Однако со 2 мая они находятся в оплачиваемом административном отпуске.
Уилкс пришел в IRS из TaxBit, Мукерджи — бывший специалист по налогообложению в Binance.US и ConsenSys. В госведомстве они проработали чуть больше года, специализуясь на криптоиндустрии.
В частности, Уилкс и Мукерджи трудились над обновленной формой 1099-DA. Она была призвана помочь гражданам США в подаче налоговых деклараций, связанных с операциями с цифровыми активами.
По данным New York Times, более 20 000 сотрудников IRS приняли предложения об «отложенной отставке». Эти сотрудники находятся в административном отпуске до сентября.
Напомним, Илон Маск заявил, что DOGE под его руководством выполнит значительную часть работы, необходимой для сокращения дефицита на $1 трлн, «в указанные сроки».